[115], In his review in Andover Newton Quarterly Robert M. McCoy reported in 1963: "in not a few instances the New World Translation contains passages which must be considered as 'theological translations.' [14] Although commentators have said a scholarly effort went into the translation, critics have described it as "biased". Helvidius, the devout scholar of northern Italy (400 A.D.), who had the pure manuscripts, accused Jerome of using corrupt manuscripts on this text. Many Catholic and Protestant scholars have accused this Bible of flaws and biased interpretations. 1, p.416). The Jesuits had before them a DOUBLE task both to SUPPLANT the authority of the Greek of the Received Text by another Greek New Testament, and then upon this mutilated foundation, to bring forth a new English version which might retire into the background, the King James. The most common violation is its pervasive tendency to subvert the most natural understanding of the Greek text in favour of a preferred religious view. Dr. Westcott has been unconsciously influenced into a pro-Roman Catholic attitude. [99] In 1989, Kedar-Kopfstein said, "In my linguistic research in connection with the Hebrew Bible and translations, I often refer to the English edition of what is known as the 'New World Translation.' Double brackets were used to indicate text considered doubtful. This was an attempt to discover the literary forms and sources used by the writer of each book. And God said: "Let there be light." If people influence others to sin or not to believe, then theyareto be named as devilish and condemned as traitors to Christ. By 1845, it was obvious that Newman had accomplished all he could secretly, so he then openly left the Church of England. But I say to you, love your enemies, do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and abuse you., (3) AMERICAN REVISED. [26] The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures was released at a Jehovah's Witness convention at Yankee Stadium, New York, on August 2, 1950. But, she wanted someone to fight against the Jesuits and wrote to Beza, co-worker with Calvin, to see if he would take up the challenge. The complete New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures was released as a single volume in 1961,[12][13] and has since undergone various revisions. As for the saints, we are exhorted to. [132][129] In rebuttal, Thomas Howe strongly criticized BeDuhn's positive review of the New World Translation, stating that BeDuhn's main goal is to deny the deity of Christ. [77] Production of the NWT in American Sign Language began in 2006; the New Testament was made available by 2010,[78][79] and the complete ASL edition was released in February 2020. Hort and Westcott were committed Communists. 2 The Apocryphal books are equal to the canonical ones. During the period from 1963 to 1989, the New World Translation became available in ten additional languages. Vital texts were deliberately left out of the Vaticanus texts that could not support Romes teaching and claims, e.g. [39] The publishers stated that "the particulars of [the New World Bible Translation Committee's members] university or other educational training are not the important thing" and that "the translation testifies to their qualification". The remaining 3-5% that disagree with the majority of manuscripts. It is known that W&H acted in secret. 1870 Westcott and Hort print tentative edition of their Greek N.T. Even so, note that Challoners work brought the Douay closer to the KJAV than any Catholic would have wished! Cranmer a traitor and Latimer a vulgar ranter. The new Bible versions are not based on Erasmus Textus Receptus. This translation was indeed to do on the INSIDE of England, what the great navy of Philip 2 was to do on the OUTSIDE. The Reformation became a great schism. (1) KING JAMES BIBLE OF 1611. But lets give a explanation of who Westcott and Hort were, then go into Wescott's and Hort's Greek translation of the Bible and how Hort and Westcott persuaded scholars of the Revision Committee to switch to the corrupted Alexandrian text for the new version they were working on. May 17th the Revised Version is published in England, selling two million copies within four days. No such reason impelled the Jesuits of Rheims. Again,Westcott and Horts Greek New Testament is the source text for todays modern Bible versions. July 1st Westcott to Hort: The Revision on the whole surprised me by prospects of hope. "[62] However, the translators of the New World Translation believed that the name Jehovah was present in the original manuscripts of the New Testament when quoting from the Old Testament, but replaced with the other terms by later copyists. It is also known as the Westcott and Hort text, after its editors Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892). If he be condemned, what will become of me? (Life, Vol.I,p.94). While rector of the English College at Rome, he studied under Cardinal Angelo Mai (1782-1854), prefect of the Vatican library and celebrated editor of the Codex Vaticanus.(W.P. [34], The New World Translation was produced by the New World Bible Translation Committee, formed in 1947. (Interlinear Westcott and Hort Greek New Testament with Strongs Numbers and Morphological Codes). But, on the whole, it offers a reliable vision of the Word of God, which can lead men to the New World, that is, to the Messianic Kingdom". Here the Jesuits assembled a company of learned scholars..and from here they directed the movements of Philip 2 of Spain as he prepared a GREAT FLEET to CRUSH England and bring it back to the FEET of the POPE. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. He contrasted it with the Catholic Vulgate which, he declared, was a true comment on the original text., Something still had to be done to undercut the influence of that holy book. Were Westcott and Hort Secret Practitioners of the Occults? The quote above shows, rather, a disinterest in truth that equals that of atheism which is why atheists quote him. Criticism of the New World Translation is particularly concentrated on Christological issues, mainly the translation of the word kurios (Greek: ) as "Jehovah"usually translated "Lord" by the classical translators and its rendering of John 1:1. Milton was a name of horror.(J.A. Nov., Advent Sunday Westcott: All stigmatise him (a Dr. Hampden) as a heretic,I thought myself that he was grievously in error, but yesterday I read over the selections from his writings which his adversaries make, and in them I found systematically expressed the very strains of thought which I have been endeavouring to trace out for the last two or three years. Forget the public pronouncements based on scripture these are only ploys to make Rome appear pious. The Alexandrian school had no qualms about deception uttered for the greater good of a cause. (1) KING JAMES BIBLE OF 1611. I must work out and examine the argument in more detail, but at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable. (Life, Vol.I, p.416). In their so-called New World Translation, the term Kyrios is rendered Jehovah instead of Lord everywhere in the New Testament (237 times) except at Philippians 2.11, where St. Paul refers the word to Christ. I had learnt, like other Protestant children, that the Pope was the Antichrist, and that Gregory VII had been a special revelation of that being. You well know with what folds it entwines us and with what fangs it gnaws us.(The Jesuits in History, Hector Macpherson, Ozark Book Publishers, 1997, Appendix 1). Newman, then, paved the way for the coming of Westcott & Hort and their abominable new versions, based as they were on the Alexandrian texts and other heretical sources. pp.251,252). Let us examine what Westcott and Hort actually believed. The New World Translation uses the name Jehovah 6,979 times in the Old Testament. But it's hard to spot a wolf when he looks like a sheep. Thus, the church (Rome) is the final authority, not Christ or Gods word. Westcott and Hort were responsible for the greatest feat in textual criticism. A. Hort (1881) was used as the basis for translating the New Testament into English. I have been surprised, in comparing the Revised Testament with other versions, to find how many of the changes, which are important and valuable, have been anticipated by the Rhemish translation, which now forms a part of what is known as the Douay Bible And yet a careful comparison of these new translations with the Rhemish Testament, shows them, in many instances, to be simply a return to this old version, and leads us to think that possibly there were as finished scholars three hundred years ago as now, and nearly as good apparatus for the proper rendering of the original text.. What matters is that Tischendorf is behind an attempt to dismantle and finally destroy Christian beliefs, by firstly destroying faith in Gods word. One need only read the letters between these two "gentlemen" to see their thoroughly black-hearted correspondence and intent to confuse and change God's Word. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you., (2) JESUIT VERSION. They were using the Jesuitic method adapted by Ignatius Loyola from an earlier baptized pagan, Clement of Alexandria (about A.D. 200). The old Italic version, into rude Low Latin of the second century, held its own as long as Latin continued to be the language of the people. These men are obviously led by the spirit but I am not entirely sure it is Holy. It is a sad thing when men make merchandise of the Word of God.(Gipp). They are exactly the same sources found in the Jesuit bible of 1582 and these are reproduced in the first of the cursed new versions the Revised Version! ): In my first term at the University, the controversial fires were beginning to blaze . Also bear in mind that Rome never claims to be Christian as such, but prefers to be called by its title, Roman Catholicism. For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life. [Ed. The Jesuits merely repeat the same hatred shown by popes and Rome. Jehovah's WitnessesProclaimers of God's Kingdom (1993) Chap. has almost succeeded. In 1851 Westcott was ordained an Anglican priest and Hort in 1856: their careers were spent mostly in academic positions rather than pastorates. There will be a true church awaiting his return. The great Revision Committee that was formed after the time of the discovery of the Vanticanus and Sinaiticus manuscripts, was DOMINATED by Westcott and Hort. "New Bible Translation Completed, Released". [119], In 1967, Robert H. Countess wrote that the "NWT has certain praiseworthy featuresfor example, an apparatus criticuseveryone must admit", but described the NWT's rendering of "a god" at John 1:1 as "most unfortunate for several reasons". His work used sheer biblical logic and so he managed to deal a massive blow to the Jesuit fakery. This is exactly what the new version writers did to the KJAV and its original sources! It is necessary that those handling the inspired word of God themselves be spiritual men. The above quote is not alone. Every statement of language allows for a certain latitude in interpreting or translating. [95], Samuel Haas, in his 1955 review of the first volume of the NWT in the Journal of Biblical Literature, stated that he did not agree with the introduction of the name Jehovah: "religious bias is shown most clearly in the policy of translating the tetragrammaton as Jehovah. And His father and mother were marvelling upon those things which were spoken concerning Him., (3) AMERICAN REVISED;And His father and His mother were marveling at the things which were spoken concerning Him.. The majority, then, did not bother with Romes Vulgate. Newman declared that the principles of Roman Catholicism could be taught in the Church of England under the Thirty-Nine Articles. They sent missionaries to Egypt, which was the land of Isis (Queen of Heaven) and Horus (the sun god), and Baal worship (which began with Nimrod). Few graduate from those worldly institutions who do not accept it. Both Westcott and Hort were known to have resented the pre-eminence given to the Authorized Version and its underlying Greek Text. Anyone with a smattering of knowledge of Jesuits will readily admit that a Jesuit plot idea is a very strong contender, for this is exactly what Jesuits were set up by Rome to do. I have been surprised, in comparing the Revised Testament with other versions, to find how many of the changes, which are important and valuable, have been anticipated by the Rhemish translation, which now forms a part of what is known as the Douay Bible And yet a careful comparison of these new translations with the Rhemish Testament, shows them, in many instances, to be simply a return to this old version, and leads us to think that possibly there were as finished scholars three hundred years ago as now, and nearly as good apparatus for the proper rendering of the original text.(B Warfield, Collection of Opinions, Vol II, pp52,53). I,II. While working on the RV, Westcott and Hort covertly produced their radical Greek text. What a heinous mix of good and bad! for private distribution only.
Is Copd Committee For Police Officers' Defense Legitimate,
David Wise Skier Net Worth,
Polly Policy Handle Multiple Exceptions,
Business Internships In Nyc For College Students,
Tony Shalhoub Brother In Monk,
Articles W